4.5 Article

Systemic inflammatory response is a predictor of outcome in patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages E701-E707

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03147.x

Keywords

Rectal cancer; chemoradiotherapy; biomarkers; neutrophil lymphocyte ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim Current management of locally advanced rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiation in selected patients to increase the chance of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin. There is uncertainty over the role of and selection criteria for additional systemic therapy in this group of patients. In this retrospective study we investigate the association between markers of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and outcome from treatment. Method One hundred and fifteen patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation had recording of full blood count parameters including neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratios (PLR). Postoperative surgical margins (R status) and pathological stage were documented. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), time to local recurrence (TTLR) and disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of outcome. Results Only NLR and R status were significant predictors for all outcome measures on univariate and multivariate analysis. Elevated NLR (= 5) was associated with decreased OS, [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI, 7.0 (2.619.2)], decreased TTLR [HR 3.8 (1.311.2)] and shorter DFS [HR 4.1 (1.79.8)]. Median survival for patients with an elevated NLR was 18.8 months compared with 54.4 months without an elevated NLR (P < 0.001). Conclusion In addition to postoperative R-status, an elevated NLR is also a valuable prognostic marker in patients undergoing chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. It is associated with worse OS, TTLR and DFS. An elevated NLR may be a useful additional tool in guiding the decision-making process for adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available