4.5 Article

Predictors for acute and chronic pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 805-813

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01413.x

Keywords

ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; pouchitis; restorative proctocolectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the cumulative incidence, onset and risk predicting factors for acute and chronic pouchitis. Method A consecutive series of patients (n = 210), who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months was reviewed. The cumulative incidence and onset of pouchitis was determined. Univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of various demographic, clinical and histopathologic variables with the subsequent development of acute and chronic pouchitis. Results A total of 198 patients were included. The mean follow-up was 64 months (range, 12-180). Sixty-four patients (32%) developed pouchitis, 35 acute and 29 chronic. The first episode of pouchitis occurred within the first year in 70% of cases. The presence of backwash ileitis (OR, 2.6; P = 0.015), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; OR, 2; P = 0.018) and the duration of follow-up (OR, 1.1; P = 0.043) were associated with a higher incidence of pouchitis. The duration of follow-up was the only variable associated with acute pouchitis (P = 0.007). The presence of backwash ileitis and PSC were independent risk factors for chronic pouchitis (OR, 5.9; P < 0.001; OR, 2.8; P = 0.001 respectively). Conclusion Pouchitis is a heterogeneous disease which tends to occur early after restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. Patients with backwash ileitis and/or PSC are at considerable risk of developing chronic pouchitis. The strong association between backwash ileitis, PSC and chronic pouchitis suggests a common link in their pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available