4.2 Article

Color rendering: A tale of two metrics

Journal

COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 192-202

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/col.20399

Keywords

color rendering; index; gamut area; full spectrum; fluorescent; light emitting diodes; phosphor; correlated color temperature; cool; warm; white; naturalness; vividness; discrimination; Farnsworth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was the best measure of color rendering, it was the worst measure of color rendering. Color rendering index (CRI) is the most common metric used by the lighting industry to represent the color rendering properties of electric light sources. CRI was intended to characterize how true or natural objects appeared when illuminated by a light source, but was never intended to, for example, represent how well object colors could be differentiated under a light source, another important aspect of color rendering. Data presented here demonstrate that CRI in conjunction with another measure of color rendering, gamut area index (GAI), is useful at predicting subjective judgments of how natural objects appear as well as how vivid objects appear, and how well one can discriminate between subtle differences in hue. Neither measure by itself, however, is sufficient for meeting all of the expectations of a light source for providing good color rendering under all viewing conditions. It remains for future research to determine if just two metrics are sufficient to assure good color rendering from a light source and whether these two metrics (CRI and GAI) are the best for such purpose. In the meantime, CRI and GAI should be used jointly in recommendations as practical, useful, and mutually reinforcing measures of color rendering. The data presented here also demonstrate that total irradiance is important for good color rendering. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available