4.7 Article

Effect of surface charge and agglomerate degree of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on KB cellular uptake in vitro

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 294-301

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.031

Keywords

Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; Surface charge; Cellular uptake; Chitosan; Magnetic agglomerates; MRI

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60571031, 60501009, 60725101]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB933206, 2006CB705602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We synthesized three types of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs), which were meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) coated MNPs (DMSA@MNPs, 17.3 +/- 4.8 nm, negative charge), chitosan (CS) coated MNPs (CS@MNPs. 16.5 +/- 6.1 nm, positive charge) and magnetic nanoparticles agglomerates, formed by electronic aggregation between DMSA@MNPs and CS (CS-DMSA@MNPs, 85.7 +/- 72.9 nm, positive charge) respectively. The interactions of these MNPs with Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cell KB were investigated. The results showed that cellular uptakes of MNPs were on the dependence of incubation time, nanoparticles concentration and nanoparticles properties such as surface charge, size, etc. The cellular uptake was enhanced with the increase of incubation time and nanoparticles concentration. Although all MNPs could enter to cells, we observed apparent differences in the magnitude of nanoparticles uptaken. The cellular uptake of CS-DMSA@MNPs by KB cells was the highest and that of DMSA@MNPs was the lowest among the three types of MNPs. The same conclusions were drawn via the reduction of water proton relaxation times T(2)*, resulting from the different iron load of labeled cells using a 1.5 T clinical MR imager. The finding of this study will have implications in the chemical design of nanomaterials for biomedical applications. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available