4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of evaporation kinetics on nanoparticle structuring within contact line deposits of volatile drops

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.10.017

Keywords

AFM; Contact angle; Droplet evaporation; Nanoparticles; Reduced pressure

Funding

  1. Eric Birse Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper deals with the evaporation behaviour of nano-suspensions. An investigation of the relationship between reduced environmental pressure and the ring-stain formation mechanism is presented. Monodisperse, nanosuspension sessile drops formed a variety of patterns, at the macro-scale, consisting of sets of rings, concentric rings and irregularly distributed stains. Stick-slip motion of the triple line (TL), constantly pinned TL and very rapid evolution of the evaporation were the reasons for each of the observed patterns respectively. At the particle level (nano-scale), the promotion of close-packed, hexagonal particle structures was observed as a result of the enhanced evaporation rate and hence increased particle velocity. Beyond an optimal/critical pressure, a combination of further enhanced particle velocity with very limited space (for particles to find their most thermodynamically favourable positions) led to the formation of a disordered region at the exterior region and, as expected, to more defects. Lastly, inside the rings, particles formed random groups of particle aggregates, resembling branches, following TL motion during the slip phase. On the other hand, particle structures resembling ripples formed on top of a particle monolayer with increasing surface coverage as pressure was reduced. This was a direct result of fluid flow being too weak to reach the TL but strong enough to carry particles over smaller distances during the last stages of the evaporation process. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available