4.6 Article

Investigation of the stability of metal oxide powders and ceramic membranes grafted by perfluoroalkylsilanes

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.10.059

Keywords

Stability; Ceramic membrane; Hydrophobicity; Perfluoroalkylsilanes

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN 209 255138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tubular and planar ceramic titania membranes as well as metal oxide powders (Al2O3, TiO2 and ZrO2) were modified by various perfluoroalkylsilanes molecules. During the modification process, the hydrophobic layer on the membrane or powder surface was created. Grafting efficiency was determined by liquid entry pressure (LEPw), contact angle or FT-MIR analysis. Subsequently grafted samples were exposed to air (2 years) or water (1 year), to evaluate the stability of hydrophobic layer with time. The chemical and thermal stability of modified powders and membranes was also estimated. Moreover, the tubular membranes of various porosity were tested in pervaporation (PV) and air-gap membrane distillation (AGMD) process after 2 years exposure to the air since grafting. The modified powders were thermally stable up to temperature of 250 degrees C. However, the grafted metal oxide powders were not stable in alkaline solutions at pH >= 12. Furthermore, the metal oxide powders and the planar membranes were also stable in organic solvents like hexane or chloroform. Moreover, a significant decrease of contact angle from 132 degrees to 62 degrees was observed after 1 year of contact with water for planar membrane grafted by C10 molecules. An important impact on the transport properties of pure water in PV and AGMD after 2 years contact with air was also observed. In PV, the water flux decreased from 1200 gh(-1) m(-2) to 430 gh(-1) m(-2) for Ti-5nm-C8 membrane. AGMD the water fluxes decreased by 21% and 27% for Ti-300kD-C6 and Ti-300kD-C12 membranes, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available