4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Formation and stability of foams stabilized by fine particles with similar size, contact angle and different shapes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.09.023

Keywords

Foams stabilized by particles; Contact angle; Particle shape; Foamability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancement of foam formation and stability by solid particles has been attributed to particle hydrophobicity and size. In this article it is shown that particle shape is a significant factor affecting foam formation and stability. Silica (spherical) and sepiolite (fibrous) particles with diameter d(90) = 38 mu m, and contact angle of 66 degrees and 60 degrees, respectively, were used to form foams by stirring the particle suspensions in the presence of 1 x 10(-4) M sodium dodecyl sulphate at 1000 rpm. Measurements of foam volume versus time and different particle concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0% by weight) during the foam generation and decay show that the silica spherical particles did not affect the foamability significantly whereas the fibrous sepiolite particles substantially increased the foamability, reaching a maximum beyond 0.1 wt% particle concentration. Both micron silica spheres and sepiolite needles increased the rate of foam decay, reaching maximum at 0.1 wt% concentration. Overall, the lifetime of foams stabilized by sepiolite fibres was significantly longer than the lifetime of foams stabilized by silica spheres. It is hypothesised that the difference in the foam formation and stability is related to the contact between the particles. For example, two spheres can contact only at one point, while two fibres can entangle to increase contact area. Under such conditions, aggregates of fibrous particles can have a large amount of hydrated water, leading to increased suspension viscosity and the formation of an interfacial crosslink network to stabilize foams. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available