4.7 Article

Longevity of corrosion inhibitors and performance of anti-icing products after pavement application: A case study

Journal

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 83-84, Issue -, Pages 89-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.06.009

Keywords

Corrosion inhibitor; Longevity on pavement; Winter road maintenance; UV-vis; DSC; Chloride concentration; Anti-icer residual; Anti-icer performance

Funding

  1. Transportation Pooled Fund led by the PNS Association through the Washington State DOT
  2. USDOT RITA
  3. ChuTian Scholar Visiting Professorship Fund by the Hubei Department of Education (Wuhan Polytechnic University)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For snow and ice control on winter roads, the direct cost of corrosion-inhibited chemicals can be much higher than that of the non-inhibited chemicals. Yet, prior to this work, little was known about how long the corrosion inhibitors and the anti-icing products remain effective on the pavement once applied. This case study investigated the longevity of inhibitors and the performance of corrosion-inhibited anti-icing products after pavement application during winter storms. The field operational tests included the daily sampling of anti-icer residuals on the pavement for seven days after anti-icer application for a black ice event, a man-made snow event, and a natural snow event, respectively. Subsequently, multiple analytical methods were used to examine the properties of pavement-collected samples in the laboratory. It was found that more than 62% of the inhibitor in the CCB anti-icer and more than 20% of the chlorides (especially for Free-zGard and NaCl+GLT) could remain on the pavement four days after the application of liquid anti-icers to treat black ice. The longevity of chlorides and inhibitors on the pavement after anti-icer application can vary greatly depending on the pavement temperature, the amount of precipitation, etc. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available