4.5 Article

Dynamic behavior analysis of fractional-order Hindmarsh-Rose neuronal model

Journal

COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 167-175

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-013-9273-x

Keywords

Fractional-order; Hopf bifurcation; HR model; Transition of firing mode

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [10872156, 81071150, 10972170]
  2. Shaanxi Province Science Foundation [2007014, 2012JM8035]
  3. Chinese Post-doctorate Foundation [20080430203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous experimental work has shown that the firing rate of multiple time-scales of adaptation for single rat neocortical pyramidal neurons is consistent with fractional-order differentiation, and the fractional-order neuronal models depict the firing rate of neurons more verifiably than other models do. For this reason, the dynamic characteristics of the fractional-order Hindmarsh-Rose (HR) neuronal model were here investigated. The results showed several obvious differences in dynamic characteristic between the fractional-order HR neuronal model and an integer-ordered model. First, the fractional-order HR neuronal model displayed different firing modes (chaotic firing and periodic firing) as the fractional order changed when other parameters remained the same as in the integer-order model. However, only one firing mode is displayed in integer-order models with the same parameters. The fractional order is the key to determining the firing mode. Second, the Hopf bifurcation point of this fractional-order model, from the resting state to periodic firing, was found to be larger than that of the integer-order model. Third, for the state of periodically firing of fractional-order and integer-order HR neuron model, the firing frequency of the fractional-order neuronal model was greater than that of the integer-order model, and when the fractional order of the model decreased, the firing frequency increased.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available