4.0 Article

Empathic Deficits in Combat Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Study

Journal

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 160-166

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318280cf4e

Keywords

empathy; emotion; prefrontal cortex; traumatic brain injury; voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

Funding

  1. US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Research Program
  2. US Army Medical Research and Material Command
  3. Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine via the Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  4. National Naval Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To understand better which brain regions support emotional empathy. Background: Emotional empathy, the ability to interpret and share the affective states of others, is a key component in human social interaction. Previous research has suggested that emotional empathy relies on several distinct brain regions, although further evidence from human lesion studies is needed to determine which regions are critical. Methods: We studied 192 male Vietnam combat veterans who had sustained focal penetrating traumatic brain injuries, and 54 non-brain-injured veterans. We used voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping on computed tomographic scans to elucidate the neural bases of self-reported emotional empathy as measured by the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale. Results: Damage in several brain regions, particularly the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, left and right posterior temporal lobes, and insula, was associated with diminished emotional empathy. Conclusions: These findings provide further insight into the neural substrates of emotional empathy, and are consistent with the notion that emotional empathy is supported by a distributed network of brain regions. Additional work may advance our understanding of the empathic deficits commonly observed in patients with neurologic and psychiatric disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available