4.3 Article

When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.59

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant [RGPIN 312409-05]
  2. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Fellowship [ST-SGS-349 (05-1)]
  3. University ofVictoria Fellowship Program
  4. Petch Research Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A recent theory holds that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) uses reinforcement learning signals conveyed by the midbrain dopamine system to facilitate flexible action selection. According to this position, the impact of reward prediction error signals on ACC modulates the amplitude of a component of the event-related brain potential called the error-related negativity (ERN). The theory predicts that ERN amplitude is monotonically related to the expectedness of the event: It is larger for unexpected outcomes than for expected outcomes. However, a recent failure to confirm this prediction has called the theory into question. In the present article, we investigated this discrepancy in three trial-and-error learning experiments. All three experiments provided support for the theory, but the effect sizes were largest when an optimal response strategy could actually be learned. This observation suggests that ACC utilizes dopamine reward prediction error signals for adaptive decision making when the optimal behavior is, in fact, learnable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available