4.2 Review

Psychopharmacology and psychotherapy for the treatment of adults with ADHD-a systematic review of available meta-analyses

Journal

CNS SPECTRUMS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 296-306

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S109285291300031X

Keywords

ADHD; adults; inattention; stimulants; treatment

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Brazil)
  3. Janssen-Cilag
  4. Abbott
  5. Eli-Lilly
  6. Shire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective/Introduction Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adult life is a prevalent condition. We systematically reviewed the literature available by searching for meta-analyses assessing pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for adults with ADHD. Methods Using wide-ranging search terms, we retrieved 191 titles from the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Two independent evaluators judged all abstracts. Only meta-analyses about the treatment of adults with ADHD were included. Information from meta-analyses found was systematically extracted by 3 independent evaluators. Results Eight meta-analyses were identified. Results from those meta-analyses suggest that stimulants are effective in decreasing ADHD symptoms on a short-term basis with a medium to large effect size (ES). Short-acting stimulants might be superior to long-acting stimulants, but no data on difference in adherence are available for the comparison of these two types of formulation. Bupropion is superior to placebo but less effective than stimulants. No conclusions about the impact of psychosocial interventions can be drawn based on meta-analyses so far. Discussion The efficacy of stimulants in reducing ADHD symptoms for adults is well documented in meta-analyses, but there is a concerning lack of meta-analysis about other treatment interventions. Conclusion The available meta-analytic literature does not cover questions of essential clinical relevance for adults with ADHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available