4.2 Review

Fetal growth and maternal glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 18, Pages 2176-2181

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.980809

Keywords

Fetal growth; glomerular filtration rate; perfluorooctanoic acid; plasma volume expansion; reproductive environmental health; reverse causality; the navigation guide

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES022841] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) may influence concentrations of biomarkers of exposure and their etiologic significance in observational studies of associations between environmental contaminants and fetal growth. It is unknown whether the size of a developing fetus affects maternal GFR such that a small fetus leads to reduced plasma volume expansion (PVE), reduced GFR and subsequent higher concentrations of biomarkers in maternal serum. Our objective was to answer the question: Is there an association between fetal growth and maternal GFR in humans?'' Methods: We adapted and applied the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology to assess the evidence of an association between fetal growth and GFR, either directly or indirectly via reduction in PVE. Results: We identified 35 relevant studies. We rated 31 human and two non-human observational studies as low'' quality and two experimental non-human studies as very low'' quality. We rated all three evidence streams as inadequate''. The association between fetal growth and GFR was not classifiable'' according to pre-specified definitions. Conclusions: There is currently insufficient evidence to support the plausibility of a reverse causality hypothesis for associations between exposure to environmental chemicals during pregnancy and fetal growth. Further research would be needed to confirm or disprove this hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available