Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis - Part 1: Two-stage methods
Ian R. White et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2008)
Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis
C Gamble et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression
JPT Higgins et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes
DO Scharfstein et al.
BIOSTATISTICS (2003)
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
JPT Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2003)
Simple approaches to assess the possible impact of missing outcome information on estimates of risk ratios, odds ratios, and risk differences
LS Magder
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2003)
A graphical sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with non-ignorable missing binary outcome
S Hollis
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
SG Thompson et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
P Jüni et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
Smoking cessation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial
DP Tashkin et al.
LANCET (2001)
Sensitivity analysis for incomplete categorical data
Michael G. Kenward et al.
STATISTICAL MODELLING (2001)