4.3 Article

Hepatocellular MxA protein expression supports the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C disease from acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

Journal

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 252-258

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01068.x

Keywords

acute cellular rejection; hepatitis C virus; liver transplantation; MxA; recurrent

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. University of Western Australia
  3. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease from acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation can be difficult. Previously, we have found that MxA protein, a specific and sensitive marker for type 1 interferon production, is strongly expressed in chronic HCV disease. Here, we investigate MxA expression as a marker for recurrent HCV disease in the livers of 14 adult HCV patients who underwent liver transplantation. Serial liver biopsies available for 12 of these patients were stained for MxA protein and scored using a semi-quantitative approach. Hepatocellular MxA protein levels were significantly up-regulated (p = 0.025) in recurrent HCV disease in comparison to ACR. In biopsies that showed histological changes consistent with recurrent HCV disease, strong hepatocellular MxA staining was present in 14/18 (78%). In the liver biopsies with histological evidence of ACR, strong MxA hepatocellular staining was present in only three of 10 (30%). Thus, assessment of hepatocellular MxA protein expression can contribute to the differential diagnosis of ACR and recurrent HCV disease following liver transplantation. In conclusion, analysis of intrahepatic MxA levels has the potential to reduce the inappropriate use with high-dose pulsing of steroids post-operatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available