4.7 Article

Role of bone-marrow- and non-bone-marrow-derived receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) in a mouse model of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis

Journal

CLINICAL SCIENCE
Volume 127, Issue 7-8, Pages 485-497

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20140045

Keywords

atherosclerosis; bone marrow transplantation; diabetes mellitus; mouse model; receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE)

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia
  2. National Heart Foundation (NHF)
  3. Diabetes Australia Research Trust (DART)
  4. NHMRC
  5. Victorian Government's OIS (Operational Infrastructure Program)
  6. DART

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products) is expressed on multiple cell types implicated in the progression of atherosclerosis and plays a role in DAA (diabetes-associated atherosclerosis). The aim of the present study was to determine the relative role of either BM (bone marrow)- or non-BM-derived RAGE in the pathogenesis of STZ (streptozotocin)-induced DAA. Male ApoE (apolipoprotein E)-null (ApoE(-/-) :RAGE(+/+)) and ApoE:RAGE-null (ApoE(-/-):RAGE(-/-)) mice at 7 weeks of age were rendered diabetic with STZ. At 8 weeks of age, ApoE(-/-) and ApoE(-/-):RAGE(-/-) control and diabetic mice received BM from either RAGE-null or RAGE-bearing mice, generating various chimaeras. After 10 and 20 weeks of diabetes, mice were killed and gene expression and atherosclerotic lesion formation were evaluated respectively. Deletion of RAGE in either the BM cells or non-BM cells both resulted in a significant attenuation in DAA, which was associated with reduced VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) expression and translated into reduced adhesion in vitro. In conclusion, the results of the present study highlight the importance of both BM- and non-BM-derived RAGE in attenuating the development of DAA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available