4.5 Article

Everolimus-eluting stents for treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions

Journal

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 23-28

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-011-0359-3

Keywords

Stent; Restenosis; Everolimus; Chronic total occlusion

Funding

  1. Abbott Vascular GmbH, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After successful recanalization of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) the risk for restenosis and subsequent need for repeat intervention is high. Everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) were associated with low rates of restenosis, reintervention and stent thrombosis in non-occluded lesions. We sought to determine the antiproliferative impact of the everolimus-eluting Xience V stent in CTOs. Fifty-three patients with a CTO in a native coronary artery were included. CTO was defined as a duration of occlusion a parts per thousand yen3 months and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 0 flow. EESs were exclusively implanted to completely cover the occluded and adjacent stenotic segments. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 6 months. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 months. Clinical follow-up was done at 12 months. The primary endpoint was late loss at the initial occlusion site. Secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel and target lesion revascularization. Mean occlusion length was 24 +/- A 17 mm, ranging from 4 to 74 mm. Mean stent length was 79 +/- A 36 mm, ranging from 18 to 158 mm. Reference diameter was 3.27 +/- A 0.58 mm. Late loss at the initial occlusion site was 0.22 +/- A 0.69 mm. There were six (11%) binary restenosis with a target lesion reintervention in three (6%) patients. There was no death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis within 12 months. In patients with successful recanalization of complex CTOs the use of EESs results in a low angiographic late loss and restenosis rate without stent thrombosis throughout 12 months follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available