4.5 Article

The effects of a group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 264-274

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215513501525

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; cognitive behavioral therapy; group therapy; identity; sense of coherence; self-efficacy; quality of life; depression; well-being

Categories

Funding

  1. Cosso Foundation, Pinerolo, Torino, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral group-based intervention aimed at reducing depression and fostering quality of life and psychological well-being of multiple sclerosis patients through the promotion of identity redefinition, sense of coherence, and self-efficacy. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Non-medical setting, external to the Multiple Sclerosis Clinic Centre. Subjects Eighty-two patients: 64% women; mean age 40.5, SD = 9.4; 95% with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 1 and 5.5 were included in the study. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (five cognitive behavioral group-based sessions, n = 41) or to a control group (three informative sessions, n = 41). Main measures Depression (CES-D), Quality of life (MSQOL revised), Psychological well-being (PANAS), Identity Motives Scale, Sense of Coherence (SOC), and Self Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis. Results Quality of life increased in the intervention group compared with the control at 6-months follow-up (mean change 0.72 vs. -1.76, p < 0.05). Well-being in the intervention group increased for males and slightly decreased for females at 6-months follow-up (mean change 6.58 vs. -0.82, p < 0.05). Contrasts revealed an increase in self-efficacy in the intervention group at posttreatment compared with the control (mean change 2.95 vs. -0.11, p < 0.05). Depression tended to lower, while identity and coherence increased in the intervention group compared with the control, though the differences were not significant. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests that intervention promotes patients' quality of life and has an effect on psychological well-being and self-efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available