4.4 Article

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma: correlation with angiogenesis

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 153-159

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.07.023

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic and differential diagnostic values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) in prostatic diseases, and to investigate the correlation between the parameters of SI-T curves and angiogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with proven prostatic carcinoma (Pca) and 29 patients with proven benign prostatic hyperptasia (BPH) were examined using DCE MRI. Diagnostic characteristics for differentiation were examined using threshold values for maximum peak time, enhancement degree, and enhancement rate. Then, the signal intensity-time curves (SI-T curves) were analysed, and the correlations between the parameters of SI-T curves and the expression Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvascular density (MVD) were investigated. All patents underwent prostatectomy. DCE MRI and histological findings were correlated. RESULTS: Pca showed stronger enhancement with an earlier peak time, higher enhancement, and enhancement rate (p < 0.05). Regarding the type of SI-T curves, in the BPH group six were type A, 10 were type B, and 13 were type C, whereas in the Pca group, 14 were type A, six were type B, and only one was type C (Chi-square test, chi(2) = 13.57, P < 0.005). The VEGF and MVD expression levels of Pca were higher than those of BPH. Peak time was negativety correlated with the expression Levels of VEGF and MVD, whereas the enhancement degree and enhancement rate showed positive correlations (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on T2-weighted imaging, DCE MRI curves can help to differentiate benign from malignant prostate tissue. In the present study the type C curve was rarely seen with malignant disease, but these results need confirmation. (C) 2007 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available