Ultrasound diagnosis of fibroadenoma - is biopsy always necessary?

AIM: To review the ultrasound characteristics of fibroadenoma and the necessity to biopsy all fibroadenomas in the under 25 years age group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The details of all patients under 25 years of age who attended a large district general hospital in the UK between 1995 and 2005 with a clinical diagnosis of fibroadenoma and subsequently, underwent a breast biopsy were obtained. The report of the targeted ultrasound for these patients was reviewed and this was correlated with the histopathology report (n = 447). If there was a significant discrepancy between the ultrasound and the pathology report, the ultrasound images were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of 447 patients 357 had an ultrasound diagnosis of fibroadenoma. This was histologically proven in 281 (78.8%) cases. In 75 (21.5%) of these patients the final histology was either another benign pathology or normal. One patient (0.3%) had an invasive carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients in the 25 years and under age group have benign breast pathology, most commonly fibroadenoma. Modern ultrasound is a reliable technique to diagnose fibroadenoma in the hands of experienced breast radiologists. Therefore, in this age group, it is proposed that a palpable lump that has the ultrasound characteristics entirely consistent with a fibroadenoma need not be biopsied unless there is overriding clinical concern. The patients should be reassured, discharged, and advised to return for further evaluation only if they detect a change in the palpable abnormality. (C) 2007 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.