4.0 Article

Comparison of baseline brachial artery measurements and effect on peak flow-mediated dilation

Journal

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 34-40

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12123

Keywords

adult; endothelium-dependent dilation; ultrasound; vascular function; youth

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundFlow-mediated dilation (FMD) following reactive hyperaemia can use different time-point measures for baseline diameter. The aim of this study is to compare preocclusion, occlusion and postocclusion baseline brachial artery measurements on the calculation of peak FMD. Study DesignUltrasound imaging of the brachial artery following reactive hyperaemia was conducted in 418 children and 533 adults. Baseline brachial artery measures were a 10-s average before (preocclusion), during (occlusion) and after (postocclusion) hyperaemia. Peak FMD was defined as the greatest percent change from baseline to the peak brachial artery diameter following reactive hyperaemia. ResultsPreocclusion, occlusion and postocclusion baseline measures of brachial artery diameter were not significantly different in children (315051, 314 +/- 050 versus 311 +/- 050mm, P=0179) or adults (381 +/- 072, 381 +/- 073 versus 379 +/- 073mm, P=0201). Peak FMD values were not significantly different when calculated from preocclusion, occlusion or postocclusion baselines in children (677 +/- 578, 693 +/- 403 versus 785 +/- 362%, P=0208) or adults (607 +/- 553, 614 +/- 394 versus 662 +/- 370%, P=0266). ConclusionWe found no difference in FMD regardless of the baseline brachial artery diameter used in children and adults. Therefore, compilation of data and comparison of results from studies utilizing different measures of baseline brachial diameter may be able to be conducted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available