4.0 Article

Ultrasound imaging of the serratus anterior muscle at rest and during contraction

Journal

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 192-200

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12012

Keywords

muscle architecture; muscle assessment; muscle size; muscle thickness; reliability; scapular muscles; ultrasonography

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to describe a clinically feasible method for measuring the thickness of the serratus anterior (SA) muscle using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) and to determine the reliability of repeated measures of that method. An exploratory clinical measurement study using a testretest methodology was utilized to determine the reliability of the measurements in a sample of 20 healthy subjects. While sitting with the arm flexed 120 degrees, the SA of each subject was imaged at rest, during an active hold and while holding a three pound weight. On Day 1, images were repeated three times for each condition by the same examiner. On Day 2, Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 repeated the scans. Images were examined offline by Examiner 1 with SA thickness measured superior to the most distal rib in the image. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and BlandAltman plots. The intra-examiner reliability (same day) during rest, active hold and active hold with resistance was ICC3,3=0 center dot 892; ICC3,3=0 center dot 951; and ICC3,3=0 center dot 8690 center dot 971, respectively. Intra-examiner reliability between days ranged from ICC3,2=0 center dot 613 at rest to ICC3,2=0 center dot 736 during active hold with resistance. Interexaminer reliability was moderate during active hold (ICC2,2=0 center dot 526) and active hold with resistance (ICC2,2=0 center dot 535) and poor during rest (ICC2,2=0 center dot 425). This study demonstrates that SA thickness can be measured reliably using RUSI by the same examiner and suggests that active movements may increase that reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available