4.6 Article

CYP2A6 Genotype but not Age Determines Cotinine Half-Life in Infants and Children

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 400-406

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2013.114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State of California Tobacco Related-Disease Research Program [15RT-0229]
  2. US Public Health Service from the National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA020830, DA02277, DA12393]
  3. University Endowed Chair in Addiction
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Centre for Addiction and Mental Health [TMH-109787]
  5. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health foundation
  6. Canada Foundation for Innovation [20289, 16014]
  7. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  8. National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources University of California, San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1 R024131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of cotinine, the main proximate metabolite and a biomarker of nicotine exposure, is mediated primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2A6. Our aim was to determine whether higher cotinine levels in young children exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) are a result of age-related differences in pharmacokinetics. Forty-nine participants, aged 2-84 months, received oral deuterium-labeled cotinine, with daily urine samples for up to 10 days for cotinine half-life measurement. DNA from saliva was used for CYP2A6 genotyping. The estimate of half-life using a mixed-effect model was 17.9 h (95% confidence interval: 16.5, 19.3), similar to that reported in adults. There was no statistically significant effect of sex, race, age, or weight. Children with normal-activity CYP2A6*1/*1 genotypes had a shorter half-life than those with one or two reduced-activity variant alleles. Our data suggest that higher cotinine levels in SHS-exposed young children as compared with adults are due to greater SHS exposure rather than to different cotinine pharmacokinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available