4.6 Article

Breaking Barriers in the Genomics and Pharmacogenetics of Drug Addiction

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages 779-791

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.175

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CIHR [MOP86471] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AA000280-18] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024143] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [DA012854, R01 DA013783, U01 DA020830, DA013783, P60 DA005130, DA 0220830, P60-DA005130, R56 DA012854, R01 DA012844, R01 DA012854, DA012844] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [R21 MH097639, R01 MH079880, R01-MH79880, R01 MH076537] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007489/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug addiction remains a substantial health issue with limited treatment options currently available. Despite considerable advances in the understanding of human genetic architecture, the genetic underpinning of complex disorders remains elusive. On the basis of our current understanding of neurobiology, numerous candidate genes have been implicated in the etiology and response to treatment for different addictions. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have also identified novel targets. However, replication of these studies is often lacking, and this complicates interpretation. The situation is expected to improve as issues such as phenotypic characterization, the apparent missing heritability, the identification of functional variants, and possible gene-environment (G x E) interactions are addressed. In addition, there is growing evidence that genetic information can be useful in refining the choice of addiction treatment. As genetic testing becomes more common in the practice of medicine, a variety of ethical and practical challenges, some of which are unique to drug addiction, will also need to be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available