4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Engineering of functional cartilage tissue using stem cells from synovial lining: A preliminary study

Journal

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 466, Issue 8, Pages 1880-1889

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0316-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB002520] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE016525] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cells derived from synovial lining-synovial lining-derived stem cells or SDSCs-are a promising cell source for cartilage tissue engineering. We hypothesized that negatively selected SDSCs would form cartilage constructs and conventionally passaged SDSCs would be contaminated with macrophages, inhibiting SDSC-based chondrogenesis. We mixed SDSCs with fibrin gel and seeded the cells into polyglycolic acid scaffolds. After 3 days of incubation with a proliferative growth factor cocktail (containing transforming growth factor beta 1 [TGF-beta 1], insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I], and basic fibroblast growth factor [FGF-2]), the cell-fibrin-polyglycolic acid constructs were transferred into rotating bioreactor systems and cultured with a chondrogenic growth factor cocktail (TGF-beta 1/IGF-I) for up to 4 weeks. Tissue constructs based on negatively selected SDSCs had cartilaginous characteristics; were rich in glycosaminoglycans and collagen II; exhibited high expression of mRNA and protein for collagen II, aggrecan, and Sox 9; exhibited a negligible level of mRNA and protein for collagens I and X; and had an equilibrium modulus in the range of values measured for native human cartilage. Conventional passage yielded SDSCs with contaminating macrophages, which adversely affected the quality of tissue-engineered cartilage. We thus propose functional cartilage constructs could be engineered in vitro through the use of negatively isolated SDSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available