4.5 Article

Nafamostat mesilate, a potent tryptase inhibitor, modulates periodontitis in rats

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 967-973

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0463-1

Keywords

Periodontal diseases; Tryptases; Alveolar bone loss; Rats

Funding

  1. FAPESP, Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [07/50665-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous reports have demonstrated increased tryptase-like proteolytic activity in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontal disease. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of tryptase inhibition with nafamostat mesilate (NM, 6-amino-2-naphtlyl p-guanidinobenzoate dimethansulfonate) on the development of experimental periodontitis in rats. Eighty (80) male Wistar rats were randomly separated into four groups: Control group, NM group (daily 0.1 mg/kg body weight of NM, i.p.), Ligature group (ligature placed at lower right first molars), and NM+Ligature group. The amount of alveolar bone loss (ABL) around the mesial root surface of the first mandibulary molar, as well as the myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, and total proteolytic activity [N-benzoyl-l-arginine-p-nitroanilide (BApNA) substrate] were determined at 7 and 14 days. NM led to significantly (p < 0.05) decreased ABL in animals subjected to ligature-induced periodontitis. Tryptase inhibition prevented the onset of significant ABL at 7 days of experiment (0.44 +/- 0.16 and 0.60 +/- 0.22, p > 0.05, NM+Ligature and Control, respectively) and significantly decreased the ABL at 14 days (0.97 +/- 0.17 versus 1.82 +/- 0.26, p < 0.001, NM+Ligature versus Ligature, respectively). In addition, NM significantly decreased MPO and total proteolytic activity at 14 days (p < 0.05). These data provided evidence that tryptase inhibition with NM attenuates gingival granulocyte infiltration and ABL in an experimental model of periodontitis in rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available