4.5 Article

Physical properties of self-, dual-, and light-cured direct core materials

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 597-603

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0405-y

Keywords

Core material; Composite; Physical properties; Strength; Shrinkage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study is to evaluate flexural strength, flexural modulus, compressive strength, curing temperature, curing depth, volumetric shrinkage, water sorption, and hygroscopic expansion of two self-, three dual-, and three light-curing resin-based core materials. Flexural strength and water sorption were measured according to ISO 4049, flexural modulus, compressive strength, curing temperature, and curing depth according to well-proven, literature-known methods, and the volumetric behavior was determined by the Archimedes' principle. ANOVA was calculated to find differences between the materials' properties, and correlation of water sorption and hygroscopic expansion was analysed according to Pearson (p < 0.05). Clearfil Photo Core demonstrated the highest flexural strength (125 +/- 12 MPa) and curing depth (15.2 +/- 0.1 mm) and had the highest flexural modulus (a parts per thousand 12.6 +/- 1.2 GPa) concertedly with Multicore HB. The best compressive strength was measured for Voco Rebilda SC and Clearfil DC Core Auto (a parts per thousand 260 +/- 10 MPa). Encore SuperCure Contrast had the lowest water sorption (11.8 +/- 3.3 A mu g mm(-3)) and hygroscopic expansion (0.0 A +/- 0.2 vol.%). Clearfil Photo Core and Encore SuperCure Contrast demonstrated the lowest shrinkage (a parts per thousand 2.1 A +/- 0.1 vol.%). Water sorption and hygroscopic expansion had a very strong positive correlation. The investigated core materials significantly differed in the tested properties. The performance of the materials depended on their formulation, as well as on the respective curing process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available