Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?
M. Cassetta et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2014)
A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template
Marjolein Vercruyssen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY (2014)
Accuracy of Two Stereolithographic Surgical Templates: A Retrospective Study
Michele Cassetta et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2013)
Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides
Jan D'haese et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2013)
Conventional Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer-Assisted Implant Placement. Part I: Relationship of Radiographic Gray Density and Implant Stability
Volkan Arisan et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2013)
Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery
Richard Koop et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2013)
Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning
Paul W. Poeschl et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2013)
Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles
Megumi Ochi et al.
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE (2013)
IMPACT OF OPERATOR EXPERIENCE ON THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL TEMPLATES: AN IN VITRO STUDY
Sarra E. Cushen et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2013)
A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae
Jan D'haese et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)
Accuracy and Complications Using Computer-Designed Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Oral Rehabilitation by Means of Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature
Jan D'haese et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)
Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hard-tissue aspects. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012
Alberto Sicilia et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2012)
Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review
Margareta Hultin et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2012)
Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement
N. Van Assche et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2012)
Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study
Christoph Vasak et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2011)
Surgical Experience Influences 2-Stage Implant Osseointegration
Sumaia Ahmad Zoghbi et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2011)
Root Contact during Drilling for Microimplant Placement Affect of Surgery Site and Operator Expertise
U-Hyeong Cho et al.
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST (2010)
Tolerance within a surgical guide
N. Van Assche et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2010)
Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study
Jacob Horwitz et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2009)
The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy
M. Vercruyssen et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION (2008)
Implant survival rates for oral and maxillofacial surgery residents: A retrospective clinical review with analysis of resident level of training on implant survival
Maico D. Melo et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2006)
Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: A prospective multicenter study
W Becker et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2005)
Share Paper
