4.5 Article

Evaluation of novel resorbable membranes for bone augmentation in a rat model

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages E8-E14

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12519

Keywords

biodegradable barrier membrane; biphasic calcium phosphate; block autologous bone graft; composite; poly(trimethylene carbonate)

Funding

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council [2011617074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesOur study compared two novel, biodegradable poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) barrier membranes to clinically applied barrier membranes in maintaining volume of block autologous bone grafts in a rat mandible model. Material and methodsTwo hundred and forty rats were included in this study. Block autologous bone grafts of 5mm in diameter were harvested from the mandibular angles and transplanted onto the contralateral side. The bone grafts were either covered with a membrane or left uncovered. The applied membranes included pure PTMC membranes, biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) incorporated PTMC composite membranes, expanded poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) membranes (Tex) and collagen membranes (Geistlich Bio-Gide). After 2, 4 and 12weeks, the rat mandibles were retrieved and analysed by histological evaluation and CT quantification. ResultsThe histological evaluation revealed that in time the block autologous bone graft was well integrated to the recipient bone via gradually maturing newly formed bone and did not show signs of resorption, independent of membrane coverage or types of membrane. CT quantification showed the volume of the bone graft and recipient bone together was maintained by new bone formation and recipient bone resorption. ConclusionsOur study showed that the use of PTMC membranes and PTMC-BCP composite membranes resulted in similar bone remodelling to the collagen membranes and e-PTFE membranes and that the use of barrier membranes did not interfere with bone remodelling of the bone grafts and recipient bones. However, the used barrier membranes seemed not to contribute in maintaining the volume of block autologous bone grafts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available