4.5 Article

In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 21-28

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12060

Keywords

bioactive glass; bone healing; bone-to-implant contact; dog model; hydroxyapatite; surface modification; titanium implants

Funding

  1. Dental Implant and Osseointegration Research Chair (DIORC), College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  2. BioMedical Materials Institute [P2.04 BONE-IP]
  3. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesAlthough titanium is commonly used as a favorable bone implant material due to its mechanical properties, its bioactive and osteoconductive capacity is relatively low. Calcium phosphate ceramics, predominantly hydroxyapatite (HA), have been frequently used for coating purposes to improve the bioactive properties. In view of the suggested osteopromotive capacity of bioactive glasses (BGs), this study aimed to evaluate the effect of BG incorporation into HA coatings on implant performance in terms of bone contact and bone area. Materials and MethodsA total of 48 screw-type titanium implants with magnetron sputter coatings containing different ratios of HA and BG (HA, HABG(Low), and HABG(High); n=8) were placed into the mandible of 16 Beagle dogs. After 4 and 12weeks, their performance was evaluated histologically and histomorphometrically. Peri-implant bone area percentage (BA%) was determined in three zones (inner, 0-500m; middle, 500-1000m; and outer, 1000-1500m). Additionally, bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and first bone-implant contact (1st BIC) were assessed for each sample. ResultsAfter 4weeks, bone-to-implant contact for the HA- and HABG(Low)-coated groups was significantly higher (P<0.05) than for the HABG(High) coatings. Mean values for overall BA% showed comparable values for both the HABG(Low) (58.3%)- and HABG(High) (56.3%)-coated groups. Data suggest that the relative BA around the HA-coated implants (67.8%) was higher, although this was only significant compared to the HABG(High) group. After 12weeks, all three groups showed similar bone-to-implant contact and no differences in BA were found. ConclusionsThe incorporation of BG into HA sputter coatings did not enhance the performance of a dental implant in implantations sites with good bone quality and quantity. On the contrary, coatings containing high concentrations of BG resulted in inferior performance during the early postimplantation healing phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available