Journal
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 146-165Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x
Keywords
allogenic dermal matrix; free gingival graft; human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute; keratinized tissue; soft tissue augmentation; soft tissue volume; subepithelial connective tissue graft; vestibuloplasty
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aim The aim of the present review was to systematically assess the dental literature in terms of soft tissue grafting techniques. The focused question was: is one method superior over others for augmentation and stability of the augmented soft tissue in terms of increasing the width of keratinized tissue (part 1) and gain in soft tissue volume (part 2). Methods A Medline search was performed for human studies focusing on augmentation of keratinized tissue and/or soft tissue volume, and complemented by additional hand searching. Relevant studies were identified and statistical results were reported for meta-analyses including the test minus control weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, the I-squared statistic for tests of heterogeneity, and the number of significant studies. Results Twenty-five (part 1) and three (part 2) studies met the inclusion criteria; 14 studies (part 1) were eligible for comparison using meta-analyses. An apically positioned flap/vestibuloplasty (APF/V) procedure resulted in a statistically significantly greater gain in keratinized tissue than untreated controls. APF/V plus autogenous tissue revealed statistically significantly more attached gingiva compared with untreated controls and a borderline statistical significance compared with APF/V plus allogenic tissue. Statistically significantly more shrinkage was observed for the APF/V plus allogenic graft compared with the APF/V plus autogenous tissue. Patient-centered outcomes did not reveal any of the treatment methods to be superior regarding postoperative complications. The three studies reporting on soft tissue volume augmentation could not be compared due to lack of homogeneity. The use of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) resulted in statistically significantly more soft tissue volume gain compared with free gingival grafts (FGGs). Conclusions APF/V is a successful treatment concept to increase the width of keratinized tissue or attached gingiva around teeth. The addition of autogenous tissue statistically significantly increases the width of attached gingiva. For soft tissue volume augmentation, only limited data are available favoring SCTGs over FGG. To cite this article:Thoma DS, Benic GI, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20 (Suppl. 4), 2009; 146-165.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available