4.4 Article

Prophylactic Gastrostomy before Chemoradiation in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: a Multiprofessional Web-based Survey to Identify Current Practice and to Analyse Decision Making

Journal

CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 192-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.01.008

Keywords

Decision making; gastrostomy; head and neck cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. ENTUK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Patients with advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck who are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy schedules are often referred for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) insertion. Decision making to select appropriate patients is inconsistent and the factors that lead healthcare workers to make this recommendation are not well understood. Therefore, by means of a web-based questionnaire we sought the views of a variety of healthcare professionals as to their current practice with regard to various issues surrounding the recommendation of G-tube insertion use in these patients and analysed the responses with regard to decision making. Materials and methods: Questions were generated after discussion among and agreement from all members of a single National Health Service Trust head and neck multidisciplinary team and were hosted on a website. Appropriate individuals were identified through their governing body organisations and invited by e-mail to complete the questionnaire. The results were pooled and analysed. Results: Recommendations for gastrostomy were not based on tumour subsite. Four of 14 patient-related factors were significantly associated with the recommendation for gastrostomy. Medical and allied healthcare professionals (including nursing staff) significantly differed in their opinions as to the effect of G-tubes on the resumption of oral intake (P = 0.009). Conclusions: There is no national consensus on which patients to recommend for gastrostomy and consideration should be given to the development of clinical decision-making models in an attempt to systematise the decision-making process. (C) 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available