4.7 Article

Variations on cardiovascular risk factors in metabolic syndrome after consume of a citrus-based juice

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 372-377

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.014

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Metabolic syndrome; LDL oxidized; C-Reactive protein; Homocysteine

Funding

  1. Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CICYT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & aims: Inflammation and oxidative stress plays a critical role in cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome often occurs with these two variables. The aim of the study is to estimate variations on cardiovascular risk factors in Metabolic Syndrome patients after consume of a citrus-based juice compared with control groups. Methods: The study comprised 20 healthy subjects and 33 patients with Metabolic Syndrome. 18 patients consume daily 300 mL of a citrus-based juice during 6 month and 15 patients consume 300 mL of a placebo beverage. The control group consumes a citrus-based juice. Before, at fourth month and at sixth month after treatment the following parameters were determined: lipid profile, oxidized LDL, C-Reactive Protein and Homocysteine. The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and the Ethical Committee of the San Antonio Catholic University and approved the protocol (6 November 2006, register number: 1424). Results: After six months of citrus-based juice consuming, there is significant differences at 95% confidence in oxidized LDL, C-Reactive Protein, and Homocysteine in Metabolic Syndrome patients who consume citrus-based juice. We have not found significant differences in other groups. Conclusions: Consume of citrus-based juice improve lipid profile and inflammation markers in Metabolic Syndrome patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available