Journal
CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 330-336Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.002
Keywords
Esophageal cancer; Chemotherapy; Enteral nutrition; Toxicity; Adverse effect; Neoadjuvant
Categories
Funding
- Osaka Foundation for the Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background & aims: Enteral nutrition (EN) is provided for patients with cancer. However, Little is known about the clinical efficacy of EN support during chemotherapy in patients with cancer. Methods: Ninety-one patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and adriamycin) for esophageal cancer were enrolled to receive either EN (n = 47) or PN (n = 44) at random. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities during chemotherapy. Results: Total and dietary intake calories during chemotherapy were equal in the two groups. There were no significant differences in serum albumin level and body weight change after chemotherapy between the two groups. There was no significant difference in tumor response to chemotherapy between the two groups (EN: 51%, PN: 55%, p = 0.886). Leukopenia and neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, defined according to the Common Toxicities Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, were significantly less frequent in the EN group than PN group (leukopenia: 17% vs 41%, p = 0.011, neutropenia: 36% vs 66%, p = 0.005). Lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia tended to be less frequent in the EN group, albeit insignificantly. Conclusions: Compared with PN support, EN support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related hematological toxicities in patients with esophageal cancers. The clinical trial registration number: UMIN000004483 (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available