4.7 Article

Prevalence of the notification of malnutrition in the departments of internal medicine and its prognostic implications

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 450-454

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.12.005

Keywords

Inpatients; Malnutrition; Prevalence; Nutrition assessment; Internal medicine; Hospital costs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & aims: Detection and notification of malnutrition are essential to adopt a support plan and take costs into account. The aim of this study was to describe how often discharge sheets from Internal Medicine (IM) units include malnutrition among diagnoses (notification frequency) using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Clinical Modification -ICD-9. Factors associated with this diagnosis and its prognostic implications are also assessed. Material and methods: The Minimum Basic Data Set from the Spanish hospitals (Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs) was revised, and patients with diagnosis of malnutrition (ICD-9: 260-263.9) were identified. Results: 1,567,659 patients were analysed (21,804-1.4%- with malnutrition). These patients were older (72.4 vs 70.8 years of age), had a greater degree of comorbidity (Charlson > 2: 28% vs 23.5%), and resided in nursing homes more often (3.9% vs 1.9%) than the non-undernourished. The malnutrition associated diagnoses were: dementia, cancer, HIV infection and chronic renal failure. Mortality (19.5% vs 9.8%), hospital stay (18.1 vs 9.8 days), costs (5228.46 vs 3537.8 (sic)) and relative weights applied to each Diagnosis Related Group (2.6 vs 1.1) were higher (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusions: Notification of malnutrition in IM departments is low, below the prevalence described in inpatients. This diagnosis is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and costs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available