4.7 Article

Soy isoflavone intake increases bone mineral density in the spine of menopausal women: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 57-64

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.012

Keywords

isoflavone; osteoporosis; bone mineral density; bone mineral content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & aims: The effects of isoflavones on bone loss appear inconsistent in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we used a statistical method of combining these diverse data to clarify the effects of soy isoflavone intake on spine bone loss. Methods: We identified randomized controlled trials related to the effects of soy isoflavone intake on spine bone mineral density or spine bone mineral content and performed meta-analysis with Review Manager 4.2 software. Results: Ten studies with a total of 608 subjects were selected for meta-analysis. The spine bone mineral density in subjects who consumed isoflavones increased significantly by 20.6 mg/cm(2) (95% confidence interval: 4.5-36.6 mg/cm(2)) in comparison to that in subjects who did not consume isoflavones. Isoflavone intake vs placebo intake increased spine bone mineral, content by 0.93g (95% confidence interval: -0.37 to 2.24g) with borderline significance. Increases in the spine bone mineral density with isoflavone intake of more than 90 mg/day and with treatment lasting 6 months were 28.5 mg/cm(2) (95% confidence interval: 8.4-48.6 mg/cm(2)) and 27 mg/cm(2) (95% confidence interval: 8.3-45.8 mg/cm(2)), respectively. Conclusions: Isoflavone intervention significantly attenuates bone toss of the spine in menopausal women. These favorable effects become more significant when more than 90 mg/day of isoflavones are consumed. And soy isoflavone consumption for 6 months can be enough to exert beneficial effects on bone in menopausal women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available