4.3 Article

Practice Effects and Longitudinal Cognitive Change in Normal Aging vs. Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1247-1264

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2013.836567

Keywords

Cognition; Memory; Practice effects; Mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. NIH [P50 AG016574, U01 AG006786]
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  3. Robert H. and Clarice Smith and Abigail van Buren Alzheimer's Disease Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to examine practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in a population-based cohort classified as clinically normal at their initial evaluation. We examined 1390 individuals with a median age of 78.1 years and re-evaluated them up to four times at approximate 15-month intervals, with an average follow-up time of 5 years. Of the 1390 participants, 947 (69%) individuals remained cognitively normal, 397 (29%) progressed to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 46 (3%) to dementia. The stable normal group showed an initial practice effect in all domains which was sustained in memory and visuospatial reasoning. There was only a slight decline in attention and language after visit 3. We combined individuals with incident MCI and dementia to form one group representing those who declined. The incident MCI/dementia group showed an unexpected practice effect in memory from baseline to visit 2, with a significant decline thereafter. This group did not demonstrate practice effects in any other domain and showed a downward trajectory in all domains at each evaluation. Modeling cognitive change in an epidemiologic sample may serve as a useful benchmark for evaluating cognitive change in future intervention studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available