4.6 Article

Automatic seizure detection in long-term scalp EEG using an adaptive thresholding technique: A validation study for clinical routine

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages 1346-1352

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.104

Keywords

Epilepsy; Long-term scalp EEG; Automatic seizure detection; Power spectral analysis; Adaptive thresholding technique

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In a previous study we proposed a robust method for automatic seizure detection in scalp EEG recordings. The goal of the current study was to validate an improved algorithm in a much larger group of patients in order to show its general applicability in clinical routine. Methods: For the detection of seizures we developed an algorithm based on Short Time Fourier Transform, calculating the integrated power in the frequency band 2.5-12 Hz for a multi-channel seizure detection montage referenced against the average of Fz-Cz-Pz. For identification of seizures an adaptive thresholding technique was applied. Complete data sets of each patient were used for analyses for a fixed set of parameters. Results: 159 patients (117 temporal-lobe epilepsies (TLE), 35 extra-temporal lobe epilepsies (ETLE), 7 other) were included with a total of 25,278 h of EEG data, 794 seizures were analyzed. The sensitivity was 87.3% and number of false detections per hour (FpH) was 0.22/h. The sensitivity for TLE patients was 89.9% and FpH = 0.19/h; for ETLE patients sensitivity was 77.4% and FpH = 0.25/h. Conclusions: The seizure detection algorithm provided high values for sensitivity and selectivity for unselected large EEG data sets without a priori assumptions of seizure patterns. Significance: The algorithm is a valuable tool for fast and effective screening of long-term scalp EEG recordings. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available