4.6 Article

Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulate sensory perception and pain? A meta-analysis study

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 9, Pages 1847-1858

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.020

Keywords

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); Corticospinal excitability; Pain level; Sensory threshold; Pain threshold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on sensory (STh) and pain thresholds (PTh) in healthy individuals and pain levels (PL) in patients with chronic pain. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for a-tDCS studies. Methodological quality was examined using the PEDro and Downs and Black (D&B) assessment tools. Results: a-tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) increases both STh (P < 0.005, with the effect size of 22.19%) and PTh (P < 0.001, effect size of 19.28%). In addition, STh was increased by a-tDCS of the primary sensory cortex (S1) (P < 0.05 with an effect size of 4.34). Likewise, PL decreased significantly in the patient group following application of a-tDCS to both the M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The average decrease in visual analogue score was 14.9% and 19.3% after applying a-tDCS on the M1 and DLPFC. Moreover, meta-analysis showed that in all subgroups (except a-tDCS of S1) active a-tDCS and sham stimulation produced significant differences. Conclusions: This review provides evidence for the effectiveness of a-tDCS in increasing STh/PTh in healthy group and decreasing PL in patients. However, due to small sample sizes in the included studies, our results should be interpreted cautiously. Given the level of blinding did not considered in inclusion criteria, the result of current study should be interpreted with caution. Significance: Site of stimulation should have a differential effect over pain relief. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available