4.6 Article

Latency to first interictal epileptiform discharge in epilepsy with outpatient ambulatory EEG

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 9, Pages 1732-1735

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.023

Keywords

Interictal epileptiform discharges; Epilepsy; Ambulatory EEG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The diagnosis and classification of epilepsy often relies upon the demonstration of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). Routine 20-min EEG recording has low sensitivity, with multiple EEGs increasing sensitivity to a maximum of 77% (Doppelbauer et al., 1993). An alternate strategy is the use of prolonged continuous EEG; however, there are no data on the average latency to first IED with ambulatory monitoring. Methods: In this retrospective study we reviewed 180 consecutive patients with epilepsy referred to a Specialist Epilepsy Unit who had undergone 96 h outpatient ambulatory EEGs, without medication withdrawal, where IEDs were recorded. Latency to, and factors affecting first IED were analysed. Results: Median latency to first IED was 316 min, (interquartile range 70-772 min, n = 180). IEDs were recorded in 44% of patients within 4 h, 58% within 8 h, 85% within 24 h and 95% within 48 h. Recording for the full 96 h period revealed only 5% further IEDs. Multivariate analysis showed the latencies to IEDs with generalised epilepsies were shorter than with focal epilepsies (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In 95% of patients showing scalp IEDs a 48 h recording was sufficient for electro-clinical classification in this study. Significance: Our data are the first to show the latency to recording interictal epileptiform discharges with prolonged outpatient EEG monitoring. These data are important in guiding diagnostic practice in Specialist Epilepsy Services. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available