4.6 Article

Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 2408-2417

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.019

Keywords

Self-vocalization; Internal forward model; Efference copies; Acoustical complexity; Pitch shift stimulus; Event-related potentials (ERPs)

Funding

  1. NIH [1R01DC006243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The present study investigated the neural mechanisms of voice pitch control for different levels of harmonic complexity in the auditory feedback. Methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to +200 cents pitch perturbations in the auditory feedback of self-produced natural human vocalizations, complex and pure tone stimuli during active vocalization and passive listening conditions. Results: During active vocal production, ERP amplitudes were largest in response to pitch shifts in the natural voice, moderately large for non-voice complex stimuli and smallest for the pure tones. However, during passive listening, neural responses were equally large for pitch shifts in voice and non-voice complex stimuli but still larger than that for pure tones. Conclusions: These findings suggest that pitch change detection is facilitated for spectrally rich sounds such as natural human voice and non-voice complex stimuli compared with pure tones. Vocalization-induced increase in neural responses for voice feedback suggests that sensory processing of naturally-produced complex sounds such as human voice is enhanced by means of motor-driven mechanisms (e. g. efference copies) during vocal production. Significance: This enhancement may enable the audio-vocal system to more effectively detect and correct for vocal errors in the feedback of natural human vocalizations to maintain an intended vocal output for speaking. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available