4.6 Article

Threshold curves for transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve reliability of motor pathway status assessment

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages 975-983

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.005

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor evoked potential; Motor threshold; Cortex; Excitability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To provide a new protocol for a simple determination of resting motor threshold (MT) and assessment of excitation-inhibition balance in motor cortex and pathways. Methods: Navigated TMS was used to map cortical representation area of the FDI muscle bilaterally in ten healthy subjects. Reference MTs were determined using a threshold hunting paradigm. Subsequently, a novel stimulation protocol was applied which included 70 stimuli (7 intensities, sub-and suprathreshold). The MT-curve was constructed by computing the MTs with several threshold amplitudes with the novel protocol. The measurements were repeated. Sensitivity of the MT-curve to stimulus location was also tested. Results: The reference MTs agreed with those determined with the novel protocol (R = 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001). Based on coefficient of repeatability derived from non-parametric one-way ANOVA, the repeatability was good (qAO = 0.929, p < 0.05). Generally, the mean difference between the repeated MT-curves was < 3% of the maximum stimulator output. Coil movement 10 mm medially from the optimal stimulus location increased that difference to > 7%. Conclusions: The MTs derived using the MT-curve protocol concurred with the reference MTs. The MT-curve is highly reproducible and sensitive to the exact cortical location of stimulation. Significance: The MT-curves provide a simple way to assess motor pathway status using a single stimulation train. This may be useful in the follow-up and monitoring of motor pathway recovery e. g. from stroke or trauma. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available