4.6 Article

Lateralization of interictal spikes after corpus callosotomy

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 11, Pages 2121-2127

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.013

Keywords

Interictal spikes; Corpus callosum; Generalized epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Drop attacks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Corpus callosotomy may limit secondary bilateral synchrony into the primary epileptogenic hemisphere. This study investigated whether pre-operative EEG can predict post-operative spike lateralization. Methods: The subjects included 14 patients with medically intractable drop attacks who underwent total corpus callosotomy. Pre-operative patterns of inter-hemispheric propagation were quantified by peak-latency analysis with the template-based spike averaging technique. Results: Postoperative lateralization of interictal spikes was observed in 5 of the 14 patients. Inter-hemispheric latency was significantly longer in these 5 patients (mean 14.0 ms, range from 0 to 78 ms, versus mean 5.2 ms, range from 0 to 29 ms, p < 0.01). The lateralization occurred in association with the presence of structural lesions (p < 0.05). The post-operative spikes were lateralized to the lesion side in 3 of 4 patients with unilateral epileptogenic lesion. Three patients presented one-way inter-hemispheric propagation pattern pre-operatively. The post-operative spikes were lateralized to the hemisphere of the leading spikes in two. Conclusions: Interictal spikes are lateralized to the epileptogenic hemisphere in some patients after callosotomy. Lateralization can be expected in the presence of structural lesions and/or longer inter-hemispheric latency. Significance: Analysis of pre-operative EEG spikes may predict the primary epileptogenic hemisphere before corpus callosotomy. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available