4.6 Article

Measurement of brain function in pre-school children using a custom sized whole-head MEG sensor array

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 340-349

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.017

Keywords

Auditory evoked fields; Brain development; Brain lateralization; Language acquisition; Magnetoencephalography; Pediatrics

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LEO668421, LP0669471]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP0669471] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Conventional whole-head MEG systems have fixed sensor arrays designed to accommodate most adult heads. However arrays optimised for adult brain measurements are suboptimal for research with the significantly smaller heads of young children. We wished to measure brain activity in children using a novel whole-head MEG system custom sized to fit the heads of pre-school-aged children. Methods: Auditory evoked fields were measured from seven 4-year-old children in a 64-channel KIT whole-head gradiometer MEG system. Results: The fit of heads in the MEG helmet dewars, defined as the mean of sensor-to-head centre distances, were substantially better for children in the child helmet dewar than in the adult helmet dewar, and were similar to head fits obtained for adults in a conventional adult MEG system. Auditory evoked fields were successfully measured from all seven children and dipole source locations were computed. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of routinely measuring neuromagnetic brain function in healthy, awake pre-school-aged children. Significance: The advent of child-sized whole-head MEG systems opens new opportunities for the study of cognitive brain development in young children. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available