4.6 Article

Effect of the static magnetic field of the MR-scanner on ERPs: Evaluation of visual, cognitive and motor potentials

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 672-685

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.032

Keywords

ERP; EEG-fMRI; 3 T static magnetic field; Ballistocardiographic artifact; Artifact removal

Funding

  1. GOA-AMBioRICS
  2. GOA MaNet [IUAP P6/04]
  3. FWO [G. 0360.05]
  4. Neuromath [COST-BM0601]
  5. Scientific Research, Flanders (FWO)
  6. K. U. Leuven Research Fund [IDO 05/010 EEG-fMRI]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This work investigates the influence of the static magnetic field of the MR-scanner on ERPs extracted from simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings. The quality of the ERPs after BallistoCardioGraphic (BCG) artifact removal, as well as the reproducibility of the waveforms in different environments is investigated. Methods: We consider a Detection, a Go-Nogo and a Motor task, eliciting peaks that differ in amplitude, latency and scalp topography, repeated in two situations: outside the scanner room (0 T) and inside the MR-scanner but without gradients (3 T). The BCG artifact is removed by means of three techniques: the Average Artifact Subtraction (AAS) method, the Optimal Basis Set (OBS) method and the Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) approach. Results: The performance of the three methods depends on the amount of averaged trials. Moreover, differences are found on both amplitude and latency of ERP components recorded in two environments (0 T vs 3 T). Conclusions: We showed that, while ERPs can be extracted from simultaneous EEG-fMRI data at 3 T, the static magnetic field might affect the physiological processes under investigation. Significance: The reproducibility of the ERPs in different recording environments (0 T vs 3 T) is a relevant issue that deserves further investigation to clarify the equivalence of cognitive processes in both behavioral and imaging studies. (C) 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available