4.5 Article

The Effect of Icosahedral Phase on Dynamic Recrystallization Evolution and Hot Workability of Mg-2.0Zn-0.3Zr-0.2Y Alloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 3502-3512

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-015-1604-0

Keywords

dynamic recrystallization; hot workability; icosahedral phase; processing map

Funding

  1. National Science & Technology Support Program [2011BAE22B03-3]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2011DFA5090-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of Icosahedral phase (I-phase) on hot deformation behavior, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) evolution, and hot workability of Mg-2.0Zn-0.3Zr-0.2Y alloy has been investigated in the temperature range of 300-500 A degrees C and strain rate range of 0.001-1 s(-1) using Gleeble 3500D thermo-mechanical simulator. Based on regression analysis for Arrhenius-type equation of flow behavior, the average activation energy of deformation was determined as Q = 277.8 kJ/mol. The model of DRX evolution is . The DRX model agreed well with the microstructure evolution of the alloy at all deformation conditions. At lower strain rates (0.001-0.01 s(-1)), continuous DRX (CDRX) is the main DRX mechanism that occurred near the original grain boundaries. Twin-dynamic recrystallization (TDRX) began to occur at lower deformation temperatures and higher strain rates (0.1-1 s(-1)). At a deformation temperature range of 250 to 350 A degrees C and a strain rate of 1 s(-1), the main DRX mechanism is TDRX, and the density of twins decreased, and CDRX began to occur near the original grain boundaries. When the deformation temperature increased to 400 A degrees C, TDRX disappeared and CDRX occurred near original grain boundaries and I-phase particles. According to the flow stress behavior and DRX model, the processing maps have exhibited the optimum deformation conditions to be 450 A degrees C and the strain rate range of 0.01-0.001 s(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available