4.6 Article

Hysteresis effects on the input-output curve of motor evoked potentials

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages 1003-1008

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.001

Keywords

Motor evoked potential; Input-output curve; Hysteresis; Corticospinal system; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Human

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [ZI 542/4-2]
  2. BMBF [01GQ0840]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Input-output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEP) are widely used to assess corticospinal excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Here we sought to determine hysteresis effects on IO curves, i.e. their short-term dependence on prior corticospinal activation. Methods: IO curves were measured from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 14 healthy volunteers in three different conditions of stimulus intensity order: increase from lowest to highest, decrease from highest to lowest, and random. Intensities ranged from 80% to 170% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). IO curves were measured in the resting vs. active FDI and at two different intertrial intervals (ITI, 5 s and 20 s). Results: In the resting FDI and at ITI = 5 s, the IO curve in condition decrease shifted significantly to the left compared to condition increase. The IO curve in condition random ran in between the other two Curves. Hysteresis was most pronounced in the high intensity part of the IO curves. Hysteresis did not occur at ITI = 20 s or in the active FDI. Conclusions: Findings implicate that hysteresis can influence IO curves significantly. One possible underlying mechanism might be short-term synaptic enhancement. Significance: Consideration of IO curve hysteresis effects is important to avoid systematic data bias in clinical and research TMS applications. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available