4.6 Article

Associative plasticity in intracortical inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages 1204-1212

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.005

Keywords

Plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; GABAergic inhibitory interneurones; Motor cortex; Sensorimotor coupling

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 NS003031-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique inducing Hebbian-like synaptic plasticity in the human motor cortex (M 1). PAS is produced by repetitive pairing of a peripheral nerve shock and a transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS). Its effect is assessed by a change in size of a motor evoked response (MEP). MEP size results from excitatory and inhibitory influences exerted on cortical pyramidal cells, but no robust effects on inhibitory networks have been demonstrated so far. Method: In 38 healthy volunteers, we assessed whether a PAS intervention influences three intracortical inhibitory circuits: short (SICI) and long (LICI) intracortical inhibitions reflecting activity of GABA(A) and GABA(B) interneurons, respectively, and long afferent inhibition (LAI) reflecting activity of somatosensory inputs. Results: After PAS, MEP sizes, LICI and LAI levels were significantly changed while changes of SICI were inconsistent. The changes in LICI and LAI lasted 45 min after PAS. Their direction depended on the delay between the arrival time of the afferent volley at the cortex and the TMS-induced cortical activation during the PAS. Conclusions: PAS influences inhibitory circuits in M1. Significance: PAS Paradigms can demonstrate Hebbian-like plasticity at selected inhibitory networks as well as excitatory networks. (C) 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available