4.5 Article

The seasonal cycle of mixed layer dynamics and phytoplankton biomass in the Sub-Antarctic Zone: A high-resolution glider experiment

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 103-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.06.002

Keywords

Sub-Antarctic Zone; Mixed layer depth; Stratification; Primary production; Ocean glider

Funding

  1. CSIR's PG funding [0000005278]
  2. NRF-SANAP [SNA2011112600001, SNA2011120800004]
  3. CSIR-YREF grant [05441]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Southern Ocean there is increasing evidence that seasonal to subseasonal temporal scales, meso- and submesoscales play an important role in understanding the sensitivity of ocean primary productivity to climate change. In this study, high-resolution glider data (3 hourly, 2 km horizontal resolution), from similar to 6 months of sampling (spring through summer) in the Sub-Antarctic Zone, is used to assess 1) the different forcing mechanisms driving variability in upper ocean physics and 2) how these may characterize the seasonal cycle of phytoplanlcton production. Results highlight the important role mesa- to submesoscale features have in driving vertical stratification and early phytoplankton bloom initiations in spring by increasing light exposure. In summer, the combined role of solar heat flux, mesoscale features and subseasonal storms on the extent of the mixed layer is proposed to regulate both light and iron to the upper ocean at appropriate time scales for phytoplankton growth, thereby sustaining the bloom for an extended period through to late summer. This study highlights the need for climate models to resolve both mesa- to submesoscale and subseasonal processes in order to accurately reflect the phenology of the phytoplankton community and understand the sensitivity of ocean primary productivity to climate change. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available