4.3 Article

Consideration of epilepsy surgery in adults should be independent of age

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 240-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.10.005

Keywords

Refractory epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Older adult

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Epilepsy surgery is performed less frequently in persons over 45 years of age than in younger individuals, probably reflecting biases among patients, referring physicians and neurologists. Methods: We report on a clinically heterogenous cohort of patients aged 45 years or older who underwent epilepsy surgery for medically intractable epilepsy. Results: Over a 15-year period, 42 patients with a mean duration of epilepsy of 27.3 years underwent elective surgery. The mean follow-up period was 48 months. Thirty-two patients had an Engel class I outcome, of which 23 were totally seizure-free (Ia). Six patients had a class II outcome (rare disabling seizures), one had a class III outcome (worthwhile improvement), and three had a class IV outcome (no worthwhile improvement). The majority of patients reported an improved quality of life and satisfaction with the epilepsy surgery. A subjective improvement in cognition was reported in 7 patients while a decline was reported in 10 patients. New neuro psychiatric difficulties were reported in three patients while three patients reported improved anxiety after surgery. Only one patient became newly employed after surgery while 23 returned to driving. Permanent complications occurred in four patients (thalamic infarct during a Wada test (n = 1) and asymptomatic visual field defect (n = 3)). Conclusions: We report a favorable outcome from epilepsy surgery in a large series of older adults and conclude that age per se is not a contraindication to epilepsy surgery. We emphasize the lack of correlation between outcome from surgery and pre-operative duration of epilepsy. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available